Despite this, he said they had made suggestions to improve the turnout.
“Some relatively simple behavioral economics suggestions are things like when you do a mailout, to make the information brochure look like a voucher, so people are more inclined to claim the money,” did he declare.
“We haven’t been in direct contact with the government about this before, but we’re keen to work with them to try and improve adoption, including doing randomized controlled trials to really understand why people don’t. do not access it. this. “
Having good dental health has long been associated with good overall health, and Prof Connelly said that the fact that families without access to reimbursement were already at the lower end of the socio-economic spectrum made the lack of worrying participation.
“If you are poor because of poor health, then your children are more likely to be also poor and therefore more likely to have poor health outcomes, and it can be difficult to break that cycle,” did he declare.
“You see that the gap between income and children’s health is growing over time, even in countries like Australia, where health care is universal. So it’s not just about health care, it’s about accessing it.
The research used information from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children, which began in 2004, and provides comprehensive information on health outcomes, socioeconomic background and other factors relating to children.
The researchers used data on more than 10,000 children from the 2016 survey, when parents and children were interviewed up to seven times.
The research was published in the journal Health economics.